Philippine Laws -Simplified | Free Legal Advice

Welcome! I'm Giancarlo Enrico S. Pozon, a Wushu instructor, investor and Barrister... That's right, Barrister; I graduated from law school and took the Bar Exams, now I'm waiting for the results. I created this blog to make Philippine Law easy to understand for the average person. It's all about free legal advice. There are many law blogs. But the problem is that many of them are written for lawyers and law students. They use words that can't be understood by ordinary people. Many lawyers, judges and law students consider themselves as superior to most human beings because of their knowledge of the law. It bothers me since the law is supposed to serve society. Since the law is meant to serve society as a whole, it is important that is must be understood by everybody. This does not mean that we should all become lawyers. It means that although law is a highly specialized profession, the first duty of everybody in this profession is to make the law understandable to all; that's why all these articles are free legal advice. Like I said, this blog is about law -but it's for the ordinary people, not the lawyers. It's for the ordinary folk so they will know what is good and bad for them, and that making them aware of the law will help us all improve society as a whole. This is free legal advice for everybody!

Loss

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

The insurer is liable to pay for the loss in the following instances:

1.) The proximate cause of the loss is the peril insured against
2.) The immediate cause is the peril insured against, even if the proximate cause isn't the peril insured against
3.) It resulted from rescuing the insured thing from the peril insured against
4.) If it was caused by mere negligence or carelessness by the insured or his agents (if it was caused by gross negligence or recklessness, the insurer won't be liable)

In fire insurance, for instance, the insurer will be liable if the thing was destroyed by fire (proximate cause,) if the fire that destroyed the thing was caused by something else (immediate cause) or, even if it wasn't destroyed by fire, it was damaged by something else while it was being rescued from the fire. This is just an example; every insurance company will always set its own terms in the policy to establish what causes will make them liable and which ones won't.

Deductible Clause

You find this in motor vehicle insurance. The deductible clause states a fixed amount the insurer will pay in case the vehicle is damaged. It represents the contribution of the insured to the loss, making him liable to a part of it.

Franchise Clause

This is the marine insurance's equivalent of the deductible clause. It sets a minimum, not fixed, amount that the insurer will pay for the loss. If the amount of the loss is lower than the minimum set in the franchise clause, the insurer will not pay -or he will have to pay for the whole loss.

Co-insurance Clause

This also found (impliedly) in marine insurance. If the thing is insured for less than its value and a loss happens, the insurer will become a co-insured of the uninsured portion. It can also apply to fire insurance, but there must be an express stipulation to that effect.

Friendly Fire vs. Hostile Fire

In insurance, not military, terminology, friendly fire refers to a fire that burns in the place where it is expected to burn (ex. a lighted lamp.) The insurer is not liable for friendly fire.

Hostile fire is fire that burns in a place where it shouldn't be burning (ex.a lighted cigarette thrown into the mining company's explosives depot.) The insurer is liable for hostile fire. A friendly fire can become hostile if it escapes from its normal place, such as when a lighted candle gets knocked down and ends up setting fire to the tablecloth.

0 comments:

Post a Comment