1.)
Existence and Self-preservation
Under Art.
51 of the UN Charter every state has the right to individual and
collective self-defense (such as through mutual defense agreements.)
This right can only be invoked when there is an actual and serious
event. The Security Council will also have to determine if an act of
aggression actually takes place.
An act
of aggression, one state using force against another, is prima
facie
evidenced when one state fires the “first shot” against another.
Aggression, whatever the cause, is a crime against international
peace and all states have the right to repel it.
2.) Sovereignty and Independence
Sovereignty is the sum total of the powers, privileges of a state. It
is not dependent on another state's consent. Independence is the
right to participate in foreign relations without outside control. It
is a natural, but not absolute, right. It can be limited by treaty
stipulations, international agreements and membership rules in
international organizations.
Intervention, where a state interferes with the foreign or domestic
affairs of another state (which can include political and economic
sanctions) is not allowed (Drago Doctrine) -except as a form of
self-defense or with UN authorization. Even the UN can't intervene in
the domestic affairs of a state unless necessary to prevent threats
to peace or acts of aggression.
3.) Equality
All states are equal. Each state is entitled to only 1 vote in the UN
General Assembly. But this is not the case in the voting in the
Security Council.
All states must respect one another's independence and no state can
interfere in the domestic affairs of another state (act of state
doctrine.) Official acts within the territory one state can't be
questioned by other states and conflict between states because of
these acts must be resolved by agreement. Official acts are those
acts which an office of government can perform within its mandate.
When the Philippine Government sued the Marcoses, the Marcoses put up
the defense that the acts that took place during the Martial Law
years were acts of state. This was overruled by the US Court of
Appeals on the ground that torture and disappearances were not within
the official limits of presidential power.
As
a result of equality, a state also enjoys immunity from another
states powers. This is the source of diplomatic immunity, which also
covers the property of a state located in the territory of other
states (par in parem non habet
imperium.)
It also covers diplomatic personnel of the UN and other international
bodies.
Diplomatic immunity, however, is restricted only to official acts of
the state and can't be invoked for private or proprietary acts. This
immunity is lost if a state files a case in the courts of another
state.
When
the government of one country enters into a contract with a private
citizen of another country, the purpose of the contract determines
whether or not diplomatic immunity can be invoked. If the contractor
was hired to do something which forms part of the official acts of
the state (jus imperii)
diplomatic immunity can be invoked. If the contract was for something
not included in the official acts (jus
gestionis)
then diplomatic immunity can be overruled.
Immunity can be waived by a state in any of the following instances:
if it indicates that it will consent to the filing of suit either by
law or regulation at the time the complaint appeared; tries to
resolve the case before invoking diplomatic immunity; or gives its
consent by a treaty or contract.
No comments:
Post a Comment